Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP

Passing a const reference as a function parameter in a class member function

Suppose we have a class called Line that contains the following modifier that assigns a value to a class data member.

Line

void Start(const Point &start);

void Start(const Point &start);

The line class contains two data members called start and end which are both Point objects. Since the start variable in the function parameter is a reference, and I implement it as follows:

start

void Line::Start(const Point &start)
m_start = start;


void Line::Start(const Point &start)
m_start = start;


In the main function I have the following.

Line line;
Point start(1, 1);
line.Start(start);


Line line;
Point start(1, 1);
line.Start(start);


Would the m_start data member now refer directly to the start Point object in the main function since it was passed by reference?

m_start

start

Point

m_start

m_start

Point

Point

Point

1 Answer
1

Would the m_start data member now refer directly to the start Point
object in the main function since it was passed by reference?

No. One of the properties of C++ references (and one of the ways in which their behavior differs from that of pointers) is that it's impossible to reseat a reference -- that is, you can't make a reference that was 'referring to' one thing later 'refer to' a different thing. (And of course if your m_start member variable was of type Point rather than type Point &, then there's no reference to attempt-to-reseat anyway)

m_start

Point

Point &

Instead, start's copy-constructor will be invoked to copy start's contents into your m_start member-variable.

start

start

m_start

The upshot is that your Start() method will behave exactly like a similarly-implemented void Line::Start(Point start) method would, with the following exceptions:

Start()

void Line::Start(Point start)

In your const Point & version of Start(), no separate/method-local copy of the Point object is made

const Point &

Start()

In your const Point & version of Start(), trying to modify start from within the method would be a compile-time error (whereas in the pass-by-value version, the code inside Start() could modify the argument, but the modifications would never be visible outside of the Start() function since they'd only modify the local variable/parameter)

const Point &

Start()

start

Start()

Start()

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.