Difference between R MarkDown and R NoteBook

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP



Difference between R MarkDown and R NoteBook



I am trying to understand at a high level what the differences between RMarkdown and R NoteBook. I know they are interrelated but I would like to figure out how they are related. My understanding is this:


RMarkdown


R NoteBook



I know RNotebooks are really R Markdown documents but I am confused about the terminologies.



RStudio new file option has both RMarkdown and R NoteBook and selecting either of them opens an RMarkdown file but with minor differences. So just trying to figure out why are there two options and what is the difference between the two?


RMarkdown


R NoteBook


RMarkdown



enter image description here



I understand R Notebooks are newly introduced and R Makrdown has been there for a while. Part of the confusion could be because I never used RMarkdown before R Notebook was introduced so my related or more specific question is


RMarkdown



What is R NoteBook doing differently than just using R MarkDown or what new capabilities is R NoteBook bringing?



All my hits on web search are pointing that R Notebook uses R Markdown but I did not find any help on what is specifically different between the two.





If you are down voting, please let me know if the question is in the wrong forum or it is just completely messed up or something else
– PagMax
May 6 '17 at 23:59





I use knitr and LaTeX, so I choose the R Sweave option. Not having used RMarkdown, all I can say is that LaTex can do anything, but that power brings with it complexity and a learning curve. Also, there is a huge community of supporters and ample books and resources.
– lawyeR
May 7 '17 at 0:36





thanks @lawyeR. I am not worried about resources and I can find my way around R and LaTeX fairly well. I did wonder what Sweave was but I thought I will worry about it later. Thanks for your insights on that. for now I am just looking at top level differences between these various flavors of R.
– PagMax
May 7 '17 at 3:28





And while you are a great fan of reading the manual, how about reading the actual question which you downvoted and answer specific to what is asked in the question instead of dumping material from the documentation ?
– PagMax
May 13 '17 at 1:30




8 Answers
8



As far as I understand and from my setup there is no coding difference.
The difference is in the rendering. The file extension is the same.



When you make a new Rnotebook it adds html_notebook in the output option in the header. That's the difference. You can then preview the rendering quickly without having to knit it. It also refreshes the preview every time you save. However in that preview you don't have the code output (no figures, no tables..) (at least in my setup). Without htm_notebook in the output there is no button preview



enter image description here



as you can see the Preview options shows up but you can also knit it in any format you want. It will add it to the header code when you do so.



enter image description here



However if you don't have that html_notebook in your header, you can only knit your code to see what it looks like (the entire book) (please ignore the additional default option I put in with the picture)



enter image description here



and the option to preview doesn't show in the drop down menu



enter image description here



Otherwise it works the same. For some defaut configuration the output is also hidden by defaut in the code section.



Note that you can mix several output options in your header so that you can keep the preview and keep your knit options for export.





as an add-on there is a bug with UTC (taking into accounts accents and non English characters) with the notebook. It will screw up your output and your file... so better stick to markdown... This point is still being addressed (as far as I know)
– R. Prost
Feb 15 at 9:19






Your answer is absolutely what I think the difference is after using it for few months. What beats me is R Notebook is everything and above what R MarkDown is. Why continue with R Markdown then? You can use R notebook and directly "knit" instead of "preview" and you have your R Markdown functionality !!
– PagMax
Feb 15 at 13:12





More a problem of legacy I think, so as not to confuse people already using Rmarkdown. Plus the current version of notebook (or R) has that bug I mention above which prevents me from using it basically. My text is replaced with gibberish in the source file too depending on which way round I use (from rmardown to notebook or notebook to rmarkdown). So I am sticking to markdown until I can fix that. Especially that the notebook preview is not that useful for me, just previewing the text without the plots etc.. but it has a lot of potential.
– R. Prost
Feb 16 at 8:20



Recently I found this post which made me clear on the R Markdown vs. R Notebook issue.
http://uc-r.github.io/r_notebook



Here are a few relevant lines:



Writing an R Notebook document is no different than writing an R Markdown document. The text and code chunk syntax does not differ from what you learned in the R Markdown tutorial. The primary difference is in the interativeness of an R Notebook. Primarily that when executing chunks in an R Markdown document, all the code is sent to the console at once, but in an R Notebook, only one line at a time is sent. This allows execution to stop if a line raises an error.



Also there is this on knit vs. preview when you create a R Notebook in RStudio:



The preview shows you a rendered HTML copy of the contents of the editor. Consequently, unlike Knit, Preview does not run any R code chunks. Instead, the output of the chunk when it was last run in the editor is displayed.



Hope you find it useful.





That second part is especially helpful to understand the difference!
– gaelgarcia
Apr 10 at 3:26



The difference is that in R Notebok you can write Markdown and R-code Chunks and directly execute them and see results right away. It is kind of a Notebook for yourself.



R Markdown is there to create nice looking outputs in html, pdf or a word Document. Combining Markdown and R-Code-Chunks. A short introduction and motivation can be found here.



If you want to get more infos about the the knitr Package klick here.





Well this still does not explain how is Markdown different from Notebook. (I understand notebook uses markdown) but R markdown existed before R notebooks where introduced last year. So what new features are in R notebook which were earlier not possible by just using R markdown?
– PagMax
May 11 '17 at 5:27





@PagMax I think the difference lies in the speed in rendering your html output from your Rmarkdown file. When you want use knitr to produce a html output of your R markdown, it takes a bit of time to "knit" all your code and generate the output. To speed it up, you can view your Rmarkdown in html using Rnotebook "mode" in Rstudio by changing your output to "html_notebook", it lets you execute a re-run a chunk , then do ctrl+shift+k (pc) and the html refreshes very quickly.
– chang02_23
Jul 17 '17 at 23:29






I think the problem the OP is having is that there is not really a huge difference between the 2. The main difference I see, which I picked up on mostly from reading the answers here, is that RNB allows you to execute single chunks of R code independently and "in line" while RMD requires you to either render or not render the entire file. Imagine if you had a huge file and just needed to check on little chart. RNB is good for that. RMD might take too long to render and is thus inconvenient.
– Bryan Goggin
Sep 8 '17 at 0:47





@BryanGoggin You can still execute the independent chunks in Rmd as well.
– PagMax
Feb 5 at 4:42



http://rmarkdown.rstudio.com/r_notebooks.html#notebook_file



"Ordinary R Markdown documents are “knit”, but notebooks are “previewed”.
While the notebook preview looks similar to a rendered R Markdown
document, the notebook preview does not execute any of your R code
chunks"





I agree. The "preview" feature is the only differentiator between the two. I wonder why they hang on to Rmarkdown when Rnotebook is everything what Rmarkdown is with an additional preview feature.
– PagMax
Feb 5 at 4:39



Here's one practical difference I found :



When you need to comment out a part of text,
RMarkdown inserts # in every line of your text, whereas
RNotebook neatly encapsulates text between a single pair of <!-- , ---> signs (as in html files)


#


<!--


--->



One may say, what a trivial difference. However, just because of it, I now always use R Notebook (instead of RMarkdown) in RStudio for all my documents. In everything else, they seem the same (for my needs, at least, such as generating html's and pdf's)



Otherwise, my comments suddenly become headers,like below:


# This part is commented out, but will show as Heading 1 font text



From jrnold:



R notebook files show the output inside the editor, while hiding the console. R markdown files shows the output inside the console, and does not show output inside the editor. They differ in the value of output in their YAML headers.

The YAML header for the R notebook will have the line,


---
ouptut: html_notebook
---



The YAML header for the R markdown file will have the line,


ouptut: html_document



Copying the YAML header from an R notebook to a R markdown file changes it to an R markdown file, and vice-versa. More specifically, changing the value of output to This is because the RStudio IDE when opening and the rmarkdown package when knitting uses the YAML header of a file, and in particular the value of the output key in the YAML header, to determine what type of document it is.


output


output



One of the most important differences is not completely clear from the above answers.



From Section 3.2.1.3 of the Bookdown book:



There is also a Restart R and Run All Chunks item in the Run menu
on the editor toolbar, which gives you a fresh R session prior to
running all the chunks. This is similar to the Knit button, which
launches a separate R session to compile the document.


Restart R and Run All Chunks


Run


Knit



In other words, knitting creates a new environment and runs all the code there. By way of contrast, the R Notebook uses the Global Environment as is to render the HTML file. In fact, for an R Notebook, changes to the HTML file happen every time the .Rmd document is saved. The Preview button merely opens the HTML file in its current state. No code is run. Preview literally means what it says: it just shows you what has already been done.


.Rmd


Preview


Preview



Why does this matter? For example, if an R Notebook .Rmd file is opened, but no code chunks are run, then the HTML file will render all the markdown and input code just fine, but no output will appear. Or, suppose you define some variable x in the Console, but not in a code chunk. If you try to use x somewhere in an R Notebook, it will work just fine. Previewing the HTML document will also work just fine. On the other hand, knitting the document will generate an "unknown variable" error because knitting runs all the code in a new environment, and the variable x was never defined in the markdown file anywhere.


.Rmd


x


x


x



Similarites: The R notebook and R Markdown document are pretty much similar. Markdown format works in both file types. Both the file formats can be used for communicating code along with results and commentary to others. One can choose to knit the created document to HTML, PDF and WORD output formats. If there is an error in the code, output will not be generated. To run the file: CTRL+SHIFT+K and to insert code chunk: CTRL+ALT+I.



R Markdown document: The Rmd document can be configured via a wizard and has options for reproducibilty document, presentation slides, shiny app etc and an option to create document from a template. If you change the code, the ouput is executed in the Rmd output. It does not offer the option to Preview the document. The YAML header has output format as: output: html_document



R Notebook Document: The R nb document is launched directly and no wizard (as in the case of .RMD) appears. Along with the notebook file, an additional html file that extension *.nb.html is generated. The notebook has the option for Preview. If any code is altered or edited, the new output is not shown. The output is shown in the code editor itself. Whatever the old output was it is only rendered. No new output is generated from the code change. In order to show the code output, we need to execute the chunk and then it will appear in the output. The YAML header has output as: output: html_notebook



YAML header : If we change the YAML header from one file to another, it will change the type of the document. For instance, you have a R notebook that has YAML header as html_notebook. If you change the YAML header, your R notebook will be converted to R Markdown document.



If you have to choose one, go with RMarkdown document as it offers more control and updates documents as soon as you knit it.






By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Popular posts from this blog

make 2 or more post in bootsrap

Store custom data using WC_Cart add_to_cart() method in Woocommerce 3

Firebase Auth - with Email and Password - Check user already registered